Morality judgment: Test of an averaging model with differential weights.
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Morality judgement: test of an averaging model with differential weights.
Ratings of persons described by sets of moral and immoral actions were inconsistent with additive and averaging models of information integration. An averaging model with differential weights could not give a consistent account of the effects of both the number of items and the heterogeneity of the items in the set. Highly immoral deeds appear to have an overriding influence on the overall judg...
متن کاملMorality judgments: tests of an averaging model.
Pairs of items describing objectionable behaviors were rated for their overall morality. Contrary to additive or constant-weight averaging models, the ratings were demonstrated to depend upon the range as well as the average scale value of the component behaviors. A range model accounted for more than half of the variance left unexplained by the additive models. One interpretation of the range ...
متن کاملTHE FULL AVERAGING OF FUZZY DIFFERENTIAL INCLUSIONS
In this paper the substantiation of the method of full averaging for fuzzy differential inclusions is considered. These results generalize the results of [17, 20] for differential inclusions with Hukuhara derivative and of [18] for fuzzy differential equations.
متن کاملSelection of Prior Weights for Weighted Model Averaging
This paper addresses the task of choosing prior weights for models that are to be used for weighted model averaging. Models that are very similar to each other should usually be given smaller weights than models that are quite distinct. Otherwise, the importance of a model in the weighted average could be increased by augmenting the set of models with duplicates of the model or virtual duplicat...
متن کاملRobust averaging during perceptual judgment.
An optimal agent will base judgments on the strength and reliability of decision-relevant evidence. However, previous investigations of the computational mechanisms of perceptual judgments have focused on integration of the evidence mean (i.e., strength), and overlooked the contribution of evidence variance (i.e., reliability). Here, using a multielement averaging task, we show that human obser...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Experimental Psychology
سال: 1973
ISSN: 0022-1015
DOI: 10.1037/h0035216